@Transactional事务回滚异常:Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only

导读:本篇文章讲解 @Transactional事务回滚异常:Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only,希望对大家有帮助,欢迎收藏,转发!站点地址:www.bmabk.com

问题描述

事务设置手动回滚:TransactionAspectSupport.currentTransactionStatus().setRollbackOnly()

代码需要返回比较友好的提示,但try…catch了,事务就不会回滚了,所以在catch中设置手动回滚,但每次执行完就抛出异常

2023-01-08 13:37:51.790 ERROR 5192 --- [nio-8880-exec-1] o.a.c.c.C.[.[.[.[dispatcherServlet]      : Servlet.service() for servlet [dispatcherServlet] in context with path [/ceshi] threw exception [Request processing failed; nested exception is org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only] with root cause

org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only
	at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.processRollback(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:870) ~[spring-tx-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:707) ~[spring-tx-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning(TransactionAspectSupport.java:633) ~[spring-tx-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.invokeWithinTransaction(TransactionAspectSupport.java:386) ~[spring-tx-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:118) ~[spring-tx-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186) ~[spring-aop-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.aop.framework.CglibAopProxy$CglibMethodInvocation.proceed(CglibAopProxy.java:749) ~[spring-aop-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:95) ~[spring-aop-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186) ~[spring-aop-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.aop.framework.CglibAopProxy$CglibMethodInvocation.proceed(CglibAopProxy.java:749) ~[spring-aop-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at org.springframework.aop.framework.CglibAopProxy$DynamicAdvisedInterceptor.intercept(CglibAopProxy.java:691) ~[spring-aop-5.2.8.RELEASE.jar:5.2.8.RELEASE]
	at cn.lw.service.impl.ShiwuServiceImpl$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$33a86b07.insertRobllBack(<generated>) ~[classes/:na]

原因分析:

异常示例代码如下:

@Transactional
public String insertRobllBack(ForlanA forlanA, ForlanB forlanB) {
	return forlanaService.insertForlanA(forlanA);
}

@Transactional
public String insertForlanA(ForlanA forlanA) {
	try {
		forlanBService.insertForlanB(new ForlanB());
	} catch (Exception e) {
		e.printStackTrace();
		// 为了支持特定异常,设置手动回滚
		TransactionAspectSupport.currentTransactionStatus().setRollbackOnly();
		return "特定异常结果";
	}
	return "成功";
}

@Transactional
public void insertForlanB(ForlanB forlanB) {
	forlanBDao.insert(forlanB);
	int res = 1 / 0; //java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
}

分析核心源码AbstractPlatformTransactionManager

@Override
public final void commit(TransactionStatus status) throws TransactionException {
	if (status.isCompleted()) {
		throw new IllegalTransactionStateException(
				"Transaction is already completed - do not call commit or rollback more than once per transaction");
	}

	DefaultTransactionStatus defStatus = (DefaultTransactionStatus) status;
	if (defStatus.isLocalRollbackOnly()) {
		if (defStatus.isDebug()) {
			logger.debug("Transactional code has requested rollback");
		}
		processRollback(defStatus, false);
		return;
	}

	if (!shouldCommitOnGlobalRollbackOnly() && defStatus.isGlobalRollbackOnly()) {
		if (defStatus.isDebug()) {
			logger.debug("Global transaction is marked as rollback-only but transactional code requested commit");
		}
		processRollback(defStatus, true);
		return;
	}

	processCommit(defStatus);
}

private void processRollback(DefaultTransactionStatus status, boolean unexpected) {
	try {
		boolean unexpectedRollback = unexpected;

		try {
			triggerBeforeCompletion(status);

			if (status.hasSavepoint()) {
				if (status.isDebug()) {
					logger.debug("Rolling back transaction to savepoint");
				}
				status.rollbackToHeldSavepoint();
			}
			else if (status.isNewTransaction()) {
				if (status.isDebug()) {
					logger.debug("Initiating transaction rollback");
				}
				doRollback(status);
			}
			else {
				// Participating in larger transaction
				if (status.hasTransaction()) {
					if (status.isLocalRollbackOnly() || isGlobalRollbackOnParticipationFailure()) {
						if (status.isDebug()) {
							logger.debug("Participating transaction failed - marking existing transaction as rollback-only");
						}
						doSetRollbackOnly(status);
					}
					else {
						if (status.isDebug()) {
							logger.debug("Participating transaction failed - letting transaction originator decide on rollback");
						}
					}
				}
				else {
					logger.debug("Should roll back transaction but cannot - no transaction available");
				}
				// Unexpected rollback only matters here if we're asked to fail early
				if (!isFailEarlyOnGlobalRollbackOnly()) {
					unexpectedRollback = false;
				}
			}
		}
		catch (RuntimeException | Error ex) {
			triggerAfterCompletion(status, TransactionSynchronization.STATUS_UNKNOWN);
			throw ex;
		}

		triggerAfterCompletion(status, TransactionSynchronization.STATUS_ROLLED_BACK);

		// Raise UnexpectedRollbackException if we had a global rollback-only marker
		if (unexpectedRollback) {
			throw new UnexpectedRollbackException(
					"Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only");
		}
	}
	finally {
		cleanupAfterCompletion(status);
	}
}

通过源码,我们发现如果有全局回滚标记,还进行commit的情况下,则引发UnexpectedRollbackException

if (!shouldCommitOnGlobalRollbackOnly() && defStatus.isGlobalRollbackOnly()) {
	if (defStatus.isDebug()) {
		logger.debug("Global transaction is marked as rollback-only but transactional code requested commit");
	}
	processRollback(defStatus, true);
	return;
}

// Raise UnexpectedRollbackException if we had a global rollback-only marker
if (unexpectedRollback) {
	throw new UnexpectedRollbackException(
			"Transaction rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only");
}

If a participating transaction (e.g. with PROPAGATION_REQUIRED or PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS encountering an existing transaction) fails, the transaction will be globally marked as rollback-only

原因:就是我们内部事务已经抛出异常了,此时,事务已经被标记为rollback-only,最外层事务commit的话,这就有问题了


解决方案:

1、修改内层事务传播特性为@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW) ,这样内层和外层分别使用了不同事务,就不影响了
2、try…catch写到最外层事务,但是记得在catch设置手动回滚,不然还是存在上面问题

跨方法的异常捕获,是会回滚

3、不要try…catch,异常直接抛到最外层

版权声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌侵权/违法违规的内容, 请发送邮件至 举报,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。

文章由极客之音整理,本文链接:https://www.bmabk.com/index.php/post/88945.html

(0)
小半的头像小半

相关推荐

极客之音——专业性很强的中文编程技术网站,欢迎收藏到浏览器,订阅我们!